Optimize Your Compressor System

Optimize Your Compressor System

The performance and efficiency of an air compressor system are influenced significantly by its control system and various control logics. The design of these systems can greatly affect energy consumption and operational efficiency, thereby impacting overall productivity in various applications.

Click here to explore further insights regarding compressor systems.

In this analysis, we will examine energy usage across six distinct air compressor solutions, particularly under diverse air demand patterns. To understand how varying production requirements—such as fluctuations in daily air demand—affect energy consumption, we will simulate the behavior of these systems through various scenarios, including four different daily air demand patterns that showcase different levels of variability.

SELECTING THE RIGHT COMPRESSED AIR SOLUTION

There are multiple compression technologies available, each presenting unique advantages and disadvantages based on specific applications, operational ranges, power requirements, capacities, and other relevant factors. For operations necessitating substantial quantities of air with significant demand fluctuations throughout the day, many users believe that only large variable speed screw compressors can achieve substantial savings by precisely aligning the flow of compressed air to meet the system's demands.

This study intends to assess and contrast six distinct compressed air solutions under conditions of fluctuating air demand. To establish a basis for comparison, five variable flow profiles are utilized, as illustrated in Figures 1 to 5, providing users with essential guidelines for selecting the optimal compressor system tailored to their unique applications.

RELATED CASE STUDIES

In Case No. 1 (Figures 1-2), the air demand exhibits significant fluctuations between night and day shifts, ranging from approximately 30 m³/min to 220 m³/min, indicating a variability of 90 percent in flow rates. Figure 2 elaborates on the flow profile in this case, with the y-axis representing the requested flow both as an absolute number on the left and as a percentage of the maximum requested flow on the right. The x-axis denotes time as a percentage of the total observational period. Analysis reveals that the plant described in Case No. 1 operates below average flow nearly 50% of the time, a behavior typical of production facilities featuring two six-hour night shifts with lower air demands, coupled with two six-hour day shifts marked by substantially higher air demands.

Fig. 2: High variability (90 percent) flow spectrum